Best Known (86, 163, s)-Nets in Base 8
(86, 163, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 163, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 166, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 83, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 83, 104)-net over F64, using
(86, 163, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 163, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 163, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(86, 163, 331)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 163, 331)-net over F8, using
(86, 163, 15171)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 163, 15172)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 162, 15172)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 199 906912 449778 247127 017108 146602 458270 208447 286308 015214 977955 164361 171760 431452 219917 183878 735609 415210 320848 220523 197595 673944 831070 311900 454800 > 8162 [i]