Best Known (87, 166, s)-Nets in Base 8
(87, 166, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 166, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (87, 168, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 84, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 84, 104)-net over F64, using
(87, 166, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(87, 166, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 166, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(87, 166, 326)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (87, 166, 326)-net over F8, using
(87, 166, 14533)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 166, 14534)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (87, 165, 14534)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102531 064625 885956 877567 071027 776294 299055 509690 631327 438019 650489 121298 906128 718300 156548 157649 688217 878975 810917 863069 217876 904865 538232 513716 032160 > 8165 [i]