Best Known (101, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(101, 168, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(101, 168, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(101, 168, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
(101, 168, 714)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (101, 168, 714)-net over F8, using
(101, 168, 69873)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 168, 69874)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 167, 69874)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 549562 143469 704293 259126 773919 537939 716016 676551 716982 375567 672183 380218 642400 357956 609952 482450 524034 137155 390369 310978 994880 962473 953605 834424 610195 > 8167 [i]