Best Known (102, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(102, 168, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(102, 168, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(102, 168, 432)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (101, 168, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
(102, 168, 767)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (102, 168, 767)-net over F8, using
(102, 168, 74419)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 168, 74420)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 395843 851628 731959 190820 740103 412272 752385 010517 471863 556520 814298 793457 096971 653285 954113 413783 814846 388327 964909 473716 117533 008408 404421 309856 134455 > 8168 [i]