Best Known (115, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(115, 168, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (115, 168, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 168, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(115, 168, 2416)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (115, 168, 2416)-net over F8, using
(115, 168, 952366)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (115, 168, 952367)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (115, 167, 952367)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 546890 156244 085623 391847 172959 621237 561729 078603 277122 434821 485098 374547 005997 901123 106874 192534 364269 793260 697145 341659 959283 505503 529037 928993 834570 > 8167 [i]