Best Known (95, 168, s)-Nets in Base 8
(95, 168, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 168, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(95, 168, 484)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (95, 168, 484)-net over F8, using
(95, 168, 31525)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 168, 31526)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 167, 31526)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 550830 632668 053662 468529 460672 669444 732431 811184 864199 119202 030480 234818 437188 091529 462905 168677 792022 897869 349666 222733 312711 341288 861557 972253 488045 > 8167 [i]