Best Known (91, 169, s)-Nets in Base 8
(91, 169, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 169, 256)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 172, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 86, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 86, 128)-net over F64, using
(91, 169, 377)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (91, 169, 377)-net over F8, using
(91, 169, 17993)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 169, 17994)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 104908 165920 037243 421160 243655 766297 378020 445931 282669 340870 280540 026962 830904 643158 091410 729315 883246 396956 883877 820756 985515 380587 454618 823236 782696 > 8169 [i]