Best Known (92, 172, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 172, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 172, 256)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 172, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 86, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 86, 128)-net over F64, using
(92, 172, 371)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 172, 371)-net over F8, using
(92, 172, 17192)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 172, 17193)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214678 973968 614476 740613 269000 074676 648288 293838 533960 906037 121814 191693 131625 222089 667797 734958 544695 383755 699953 759839 200198 082221 607860 939393 308050 491305 > 8172 [i]