Best Known (11, 19, s)-Nets in Base 8
(11, 19, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 19, 160)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (11, 20, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 10, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 10, 80)-net over F64, using
(11, 19, 169)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (11, 19, 169)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(819, 169, F8, 8) (dual of [169, 150, 9]-code), using
- 6 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 5 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(818, 162, F8, 8) (dual of [162, 144, 9]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(649, 81, F64, 8) (dual of [81, 72, 9]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,72P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(649, 81, F64, 8) (dual of [81, 72, 9]-code), using
- 6 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 5 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(818, 162, F8, 8) (dual of [162, 144, 9]-code), using
(11, 19, 6158)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 19, 6159)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 144147 070361 954633 > 819 [i]