Best Known (25, 46, s)-Nets in Base 8
(25, 46, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 46, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (25, 48, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 80)-net over F64, using
(25, 46, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (25, 46, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 23, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
(25, 46, 7489)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 46, 7490)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 45, 7490)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 43598 432568 614697 396884 436598 129807 949472 > 845 [i]