Best Known (23, 52, s)-Nets in Base 8
(23, 52, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 52, 65)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (14, 52, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
(23, 52, 76)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (23, 52, 76)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 52, 76)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 75)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 75)-sequence over F8, using
(23, 52, 81)-Net in Base 8
(23, 52, 81)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 39, 81)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 80)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 80)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 52, 1674)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 52, 1675)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 51, 1675)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11426 117643 799421 748368 595957 192514 387726 263136 > 851 [i]