Best Known (34, 55, s)-Nets in Base 8
(34, 55, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 55, 256)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 58, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 29, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 29, 128)-net over F64, using
(34, 55, 300)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(34, 55, 300)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (33, 55, 300)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 56, 300)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 28, 150)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 150)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 149)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 150)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 28, 150)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 56, 300)-net in base 8, using
(34, 55, 407)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (34, 55, 407)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(855, 407, F8, 21) (dual of [407, 352, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(855, 511, F8, 21) (dual of [511, 456, 22]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(855, 511, F8, 21) (dual of [511, 456, 22]-code), using
(34, 55, 48698)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 55, 48699)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 54, 48699)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 5 847179 872269 287379 533274 927729 289703 322157 654371 > 854 [i]