Best Known (32, 65, s)-Nets in Base 8
(32, 65, 82)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 65, 82)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 18, 17)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 47, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (2, 18, 17)-net over F8, using
(32, 65, 118)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (32, 65, 118)-net over F8, using
(32, 65, 3969)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 65, 3970)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 64, 3970)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6290 581925 534046 538474 888370 770120 859054 078869 252748 367880 > 864 [i]