Best Known (45, 67, s)-Nets in Base 8
(45, 67, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 67, 354)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (45, 76, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 38, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 38, 177)-net over F64, using
(45, 67, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(45, 67, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (45, 68, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 51, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 52, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 259)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 52, 518)-net over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 51, 518)-net over F16, using
(45, 67, 954)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (45, 67, 954)-net over F8, using
(45, 67, 222096)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 67, 222097)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 213909 796964 240622 289174 566779 665517 357270 180766 182348 086960 > 867 [i]