Best Known (45, 69, s)-Nets in Base 8
(45, 69, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 69, 354)-net over F8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (45, 76, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 38, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 38, 177)-net over F64, using
(45, 69, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(45, 69, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (45, 70, 516)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (10, 35, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 27, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 36, 258)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (10, 35, 258)-net in base 64, using
(45, 69, 701)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (45, 69, 701)-net over F8, using
(45, 69, 117761)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 69, 117762)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 205 693629 320177 883599 535935 503107 926277 624390 148718 876933 075712 > 869 [i]