Best Known (45, 73, s)-Nets in Base 8
(45, 73, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 73, 354)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (45, 76, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 38, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 38, 177)-net over F64, using
(45, 73, 464)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (45, 73, 464)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(873, 464, F8, 28) (dual of [464, 391, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(873, 511, F8, 28) (dual of [511, 438, 29]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(873, 511, F8, 28) (dual of [511, 438, 29]-code), using
(45, 73, 44182)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 73, 44183)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 842765 096208 863678 318841 497429 597649 432711 461353 462338 525540 365514 > 873 [i]