Best Known (49, 74, s)-Nets in Base 8
(49, 74, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 74, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (49, 84, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 42, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 42, 177)-net over F64, using
(49, 74, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(49, 74, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (47, 72, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (29, 54, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (29, 54, 518)-net over F16, using
(49, 74, 865)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (49, 74, 865)-net over F8, using
(49, 74, 235530)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 74, 235531)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 73, 235531)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 842511 916888 132870 223345 646144 489768 309600 411245 231034 449480 229504 > 873 [i]