Best Known (35, 76, s)-Nets in Base 8
(35, 76, 79)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 76, 79)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 21, 14)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 13)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 13)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 55, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (1, 21, 14)-net over F8, using
(35, 76, 112)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (35, 76, 112)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (35, 111)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 35 and N(F) ≥ 112, using
(35, 76, 2876)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 76, 2877)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 75, 2877)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 53 927617 219509 317356 568342 884744 695088 265048 741675 683448 795004 646631 > 875 [i]