Best Known (47, 76, s)-Nets in Base 8
(47, 76, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 76, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 80, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
(47, 76, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(47, 76, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (9, 38, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 42, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 36, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 36, 192)-net over F128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 42, 192)-net in base 64, using
(47, 76, 489)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (47, 76, 489)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(876, 489, F8, 29) (dual of [489, 413, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(876, 511, F8, 29) (dual of [511, 435, 30]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(876, 511, F8, 29) (dual of [511, 435, 30]-code), using
(47, 76, 59467)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 76, 59468)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 75, 59468)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 53 926200 420553 677656 138909 088176 490849 521676 847045 905026 718680 531088 > 875 [i]