Best Known (58, 80, s)-Nets in Base 8
(58, 80, 484)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 80, 484)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 22, 130)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 65)-net over F64, using
- digital (36, 58, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (11, 22, 130)-net over F8, using
(58, 80, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(58, 80, 576)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (57, 80, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (57, 84, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 42, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 36, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 36, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 42, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (57, 84, 576)-net in base 8, using
(58, 80, 4133)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (58, 80, 4133)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(880, 4133, F8, 22) (dual of [4133, 4053, 23]-code), using
- 30 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 5 times 0, 1, 23 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(877, 4100, F8, 22) (dual of [4100, 4023, 23]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(21) ⊂ Ce(20) [i] based on
- linear OA(877, 4096, F8, 22) (dual of [4096, 4019, 23]-code), using an extension Ce(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(873, 4096, F8, 21) (dual of [4096, 4023, 22]-code), using an extension Ce(20) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(80, 4, F8, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(21) ⊂ Ce(20) [i] based on
- 30 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 5 times 0, 1, 23 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(877, 4100, F8, 22) (dual of [4100, 4023, 23]-code), using
(58, 80, 2593236)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 80, 2593237)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 766847 766093 433936 325468 865129 578325 445595 112075 490885 729572 803985 007080 > 880 [i]