Best Known (54, 88, s)-Nets in Base 8
(54, 88, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 88, 354)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 94, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 47, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 47, 177)-net over F64, using
(54, 88, 384)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(54, 88, 384)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (10, 44, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 49, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 42, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 42, 192)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (10, 49, 192)-net in base 64, using
(54, 88, 504)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (54, 88, 504)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(888, 504, F8, 34) (dual of [504, 416, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(888, 511, F8, 34) (dual of [511, 423, 35]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(888, 511, F8, 34) (dual of [511, 423, 35]-code), using
(54, 88, 48481)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 88, 48482)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 29 652065 352558 102267 106959 048183 586124 430038 222009 505669 308939 192056 378953 773646 > 888 [i]