Best Known (30, 30+11, s)-Nets in Base 81
(30, 30+11, 1677720)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 41, 1677720)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8141, 1677720, F81, 11, 11) (dual of [(1677720, 11), 18454879, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 5-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8141, 8388601, F81, 11) (dual of [8388601, 8388560, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8141, large, F81, 11) (dual of [large, large−41, 12]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523361 | 818−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1 = 12 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8141, large, F81, 11) (dual of [large, large−41, 12]-code), using
- OOA 5-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8141, 8388601, F81, 11) (dual of [8388601, 8388560, 12]-code), using
(30, 30+11, large)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (30, 41, large)-net over F81, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8141, large, F81, 11) (dual of [large, large−41, 12]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523361 | 818−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1 = 12 (BCH-bound) [i]
(30, 30+11, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 41, large)-net in base 81, because
- 9 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 32, large)-net in base 81, but