Best Known (33, 33+13, s)-Nets in Base 81
(33, 33+13, 88737)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 46, 88737)-net over F81, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 9, 164)-net over F81, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 3, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- digital (0, 6, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81 (see above)
- digital (0, 3, 82)-net over F81, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (24, 37, 88573)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8137, 88573, F81, 13, 13) (dual of [(88573, 13), 1151412, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8137, 531439, F81, 13) (dual of [531439, 531402, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8137, 531441, F81, 13) (dual of [531441, 531404, 14]-code), using
- an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 531440 = 813−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8137, 531441, F81, 13) (dual of [531441, 531404, 14]-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8137, 531439, F81, 13) (dual of [531439, 531402, 14]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8137, 88573, F81, 13, 13) (dual of [(88573, 13), 1151412, 14]-NRT-code), using
- digital (3, 9, 164)-net over F81, using
(33, 33+13, 1368146)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (33, 46, 1368146)-net over F81, using
(33, 33+13, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 46, large)-net in base 81, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 35, large)-net in base 81, but