Best Known (27, 37, s)-Nets in Base 81
(27, 37, 1677720)-Net over F81 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 37, 1677720)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8137, 1677720, F81, 10, 10) (dual of [(1677720, 10), 16777163, 11]-NRT-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8137, 8388600, F81, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388563, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8137, large, F81, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8137, large, F81, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(8137, 8388600, F81, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388563, 11]-code), using
(27, 37, large)-Net over F81 — Digital
Digital (27, 37, large)-net over F81, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8137, large, F81, 10) (dual of [large, large−37, 11]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
(27, 37, large)-Net in Base 81 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 37, large)-net in base 81, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 29, large)-net in base 81, but