Best Known (65−10, 65, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65−10, 65, 1677720)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 65, 1677720)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(965, 1677720, F9, 10, 10) (dual of [(1677720, 10), 16777135, 11]-NRT-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(965, 8388600, F9, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388535, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(965, large, F9, 10) (dual of [large, large−65, 11]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 98−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(965, large, F9, 10) (dual of [large, large−65, 11]-code), using
- OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(965, 8388600, F9, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388535, 11]-code), using
(65−10, 65, large)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (55, 65, large)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(965, large, F9, 10) (dual of [large, large−65, 11]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 98−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
(65−10, 65, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 65, large)-net in base 9, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 57, large)-net in base 9, but