Best Known (125−102, 125, s)-Nets in Base 9
(125−102, 125, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 125, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 125, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(125−102, 125, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 125, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(125−102, 125, 510)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 125, 511)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 197253 125224 736032 015359 769008 200691 654797 466050 644854 792322 361899 806040 552379 900055 330865 817027 655817 554505 067906 625129 > 9125 [i]