Best Known (134−102, 134, s)-Nets in Base 9
(134−102, 134, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 134, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
(134−102, 134, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (32, 134, 120)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 134, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
(134−102, 134, 766)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 134, 767)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 74 071357 066186 843061 633001 319995 502801 459145 806761 718498 475501 018393 191615 294053 249012 231760 039258 800385 592543 929212 288666 281577 > 9134 [i]