Best Known (136−102, 136, s)-Nets in Base 9
(136−102, 136, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 136, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 136, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(136−102, 136, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 136, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 136, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(136−102, 136, 838)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 136, 839)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6076 815102 901109 236942 287286 773821 992235 546593 257802 341432 875753 485209 176492 038402 959246 707939 047305 360958 200823 691448 155571 602985 > 9136 [i]