Best Known (139−103, 139, s)-Nets in Base 9
(139−103, 139, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(139−103, 139, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 139, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 139, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(139−103, 139, 916)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 139, 917)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 138, 917)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 485215 989248 137898 826690 527704 958534 795617 319510 072038 206741 230577 207405 562934 653293 486292 660916 938119 983799 252290 056395 219150 154425 > 9138 [i]