Best Known (138−104, 138, s)-Nets in Base 9
(138−104, 138, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 138, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 138, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(138−104, 138, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 138, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 138, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(138−104, 138, 829)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 138, 830)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 491411 953164 397518 193674 310018 345137 252981 828151 688483 910700 773628 451984 329618 442797 082608 740076 608164 793818 678844 513116 320242 565185 > 9138 [i]