Best Known (33, 33+104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 33+104, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 137, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 137, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(33, 33+104, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 137, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(33, 33+104, 794)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 137, 795)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 56830 971802 884718 742135 012304 647042 087726 772308 188668 656452 492267 646885 922123 931908 944560 307801 883786 607447 283067 504805 668685 432545 > 9137 [i]