Best Known (35, 35+104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(35, 35+104, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+104, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 139, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 139, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+104, 866)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 139, 867)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 378143 410066 402062 583722 733463 586594 262010 742300 372551 690105 447035 599970 459858 892437 926219 402721 189714 964309 440314 298576 138915 831265 > 9139 [i]