Best Known (38, 38+104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(38, 38+104, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 142, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 142, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 38+104, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (38, 142, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 142, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 38+104, 988)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 142, 989)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3288 270084 121214 449095 595051 754453 336812 473649 804674 885692 958679 733088 995356 092477 254996 673177 876432 328598 557756 189503 014783 923799 267745 > 9142 [i]