Best Known (136−113, 136, s)-Nets in Base 9
(136−113, 136, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 136, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 136, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(136−113, 136, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 136, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(136−113, 136, 508)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 136, 509)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 135, 509)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 731 832430 812597 962318 023883 341428 516380 281114 214546 502415 110181 629143 032653 419357 056871 726843 475490 769243 399847 775186 408371 285441 > 9135 [i]