Best Known (145−129, 145, s)-Nets in Base 9
(145−129, 145, 64)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 145, 64)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 145, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
(145−129, 145, 74)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (16, 145, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
(145−129, 145, 143)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 145, 144)-net in base 9, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 126, 144)-net in base 9, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(9126, 144, S9, 110), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 13985 352127 709815 135823 207322 213660 655679 036196 057151 464807 486617 148753 068973 647813 060841 422573 871412 475846 092090 726797 721652 094761 117031 / 7512 322263 802055 > 9126 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(9126, 144, S9, 110), but