Best Known (20, 20+15, s)-Nets in Base 9
(20, 20+15, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 35, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 36, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F81, using
(20, 20+15, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 35, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 36, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 118)-net over F81, using
(20, 20+15, 18223)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 35, 18224)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 34, 18224)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 278 196472 581674 081694 266709 487745 > 934 [i]