Best Known (36, 36+15, s)-Nets in Base 9
(36, 36+15, 432)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 51, 432)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 50, 432)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 16, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 8, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 8, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (19, 34, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (9, 16, 200)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(36, 36+15, 2269)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 51, 2269)-net over F9, using
(36, 36+15, 2765960)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 51, 2765961)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 50, 2765961)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 515378 144266 901830 013869 588242 280965 288762 001465 > 950 [i]