Best Known (127−19, 127, s)-Nets in Base 9
(127−19, 127, 531473)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (108, 127, 531473)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 14, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (94, 113, 531441)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(9113, 531441, F9, 19, 19) (dual of [(531441, 19), 10097266, 20]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 9-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(9113, 4782970, F9, 19) (dual of [4782970, 4782857, 20]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782970 | 914−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 9-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(9113, 4782970, F9, 19) (dual of [4782970, 4782857, 20]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(9113, 531441, F9, 19, 19) (dual of [(531441, 19), 10097266, 20]-NRT-code), using
- digital (5, 14, 32)-net over F9, using
(127−19, 127, 5102134)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (108, 127, 5102134)-net over F9, using
(127−19, 127, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (108, 127, large)-net in base 9, because
- 17 times m-reduction [i] would yield (108, 110, large)-net in base 9, but