Best Known (28, 28+23, s)-Nets in Base 9
(28, 28+23, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 51, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 52, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 116)-net over F81, using
(28, 28+23, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (28, 51, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 52, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 118)-net over F81, using
(28, 28+23, 13340)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 51, 13341)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 50, 13341)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 515452 064005 525936 416464 615713 660027 057704 738105 > 950 [i]