Best Known (75−25, 75, s)-Nets in Base 9
(75−25, 75, 348)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 75, 348)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 15, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (35, 60, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 30, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 30, 160)-net over F81, using
- digital (3, 15, 28)-net over F9, using
(75−25, 75, 1188)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 75, 1188)-net over F9, using
(75−25, 75, 506711)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 75, 506712)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 74, 506712)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41110 158101 696950 745590 536077 551781 377461 352407 468240 983925 353816 278785 > 974 [i]