Best Known (42, 42+25, s)-Nets in Base 9
(42, 42+25, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 67, 344)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 70, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 35, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 35, 172)-net over F81, using
(42, 42+25, 633)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (42, 67, 633)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(967, 633, F9, 25) (dual of [633, 566, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(967, 728, F9, 25) (dual of [728, 661, 26]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [0,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(967, 728, F9, 25) (dual of [728, 661, 26]-code), using
(42, 42+25, 117106)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 67, 117107)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 66, 117107)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 955 099565 406407 174103 716747 447104 817418 372486 813887 357573 263905 > 966 [i]