Best Known (69, 69+25, s)-Nets in Base 9
(69, 69+25, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 94, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 12, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (57, 82, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 41, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 41, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 12, 10)-net over F9, using
(69, 69+25, 6706)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (69, 94, 6706)-net over F9, using
(69, 69+25, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 94, large)-net in base 9, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 71, large)-net in base 9, but