Best Known (60−27, 60, s)-Nets in Base 9
(60−27, 60, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 60, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 62, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 116)-net over F81, using
(60−27, 60, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 60, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 30, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(60−27, 60, 15166)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 60, 15167)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 59, 15167)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 199 720502 932403 397660 324050 993801 463066 523875 987610 198425 > 959 [i]