Best Known (64−27, 64, s)-Nets in Base 9
(64−27, 64, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 64, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 32, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
(64−27, 64, 334)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (37, 64, 334)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 32, 167)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 167, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
(64−27, 64, 29827)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 64, 29828)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 63, 29828)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 310527 744405 891893 496479 464692 855328 656273 765047 086423 455905 > 963 [i]