Best Known (65−28, 65, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65−28, 65, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 65, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 66, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 33, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 33, 150)-net over F81, using
(65−28, 65, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (37, 65, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 66, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 33, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 33, 154)-net over F81, using
(65−28, 65, 20351)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 65, 20352)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 106 124253 304316 212268 730889 664696 007605 982871 951303 543154 874369 > 965 [i]