Best Known (79, 79+28, s)-Nets in Base 9
(79, 79+28, 772)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 107, 772)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 19, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (60, 88, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 44, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 44, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (5, 19, 32)-net over F9, using
(79, 79+28, 8273)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (79, 107, 8273)-net over F9, using
(79, 79+28, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 107, large)-net in base 9, because
- 26 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 81, large)-net in base 9, but