Best Known (82, 82+29, s)-Nets in Base 9
(82, 82+29, 776)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (82, 111, 776)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 21, 36)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 35)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 35)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (61, 90, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 45, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 45, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (7, 21, 36)-net over F9, using
(82, 82+29, 8580)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (82, 111, 8580)-net over F9, using
(82, 82+29, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (82, 111, large)-net in base 9, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 84, large)-net in base 9, but