Best Known (94, 94+31, s)-Nets in Base 9
(94, 94+31, 904)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (94, 125, 904)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (93, 124, 904)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 30, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (63, 94, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (15, 30, 164)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(94, 94+31, 14261)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (94, 125, 14261)-net over F9, using
(94, 94+31, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (94, 125, large)-net in base 9, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (94, 96, large)-net in base 9, but