Best Known (118−32, 118, s)-Nets in Base 9
(118−32, 118, 774)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 118, 774)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 22, 34)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (64, 96, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 48, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 48, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (6, 22, 34)-net over F9, using
(118−32, 118, 6671)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (86, 118, 6671)-net over F9, using
(118−32, 118, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 118, large)-net in base 9, because
- 30 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 88, large)-net in base 9, but