Best Known (122−35, 122, s)-Nets in Base 9
(122−35, 122, 768)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 122, 768)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 20, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (67, 102, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (3, 20, 28)-net over F9, using
(122−35, 122, 4509)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (87, 122, 4509)-net over F9, using
(122−35, 122, 5556685)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 122, 5556686)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (87, 121, 5556686)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29 063256 244319 013373 187931 324261 834308 233807 865726 052225 221436 519396 568403 412217 141164 143204 794657 047694 589427 181425 > 9121 [i]